Who Cited It

PDDL2.1: An Extension to PDDL for Expressing Temporal Planning Domains

2003 · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · 1,746 citations · 0 from inside this corpus

Maria Fox, Derek Long

In recent years research in the planning community has moved increasingly toward s application of planners to realistic problems involving both time and many typ es of resources. For example, interest in planning demonstrated by the space res earch community has inspired work in observation scheduling, planetary rover ex ploration and spacecraft control domains. Other temporal and resource-intensive domains including logistics planning, plant control and manufacturing have also helped to focus the community on the modelling and reasoning issues that must be confronted to make planning technology meet the challenges of application. The International Planning Competitions have acted as an important motivating fo rce behind the progress that has been made in planning since 1998. The third com petition (held in 2002) set the planning community the challenge of handling tim e and numeric resources. This necessitated the development of a modelling langua ge capable of expressing temporal and numeric properties of planning domains. In this paper we describe the language, PDDL2.1, that was used in the competition. We describe the syntax of the language, its formal semantics and the validation of concurrent plans. We observe that PDDL2.1 has considerable modelling power --- exceeding the capabilities of current planning technology --- and presents a number of important challenges to the research community.

6 of 6 neighbouring works in this corpus. Blue is what this paper cites; orange is what cites it, and a dashed line is one neighbour citing another. Only the largest labels are drawn — every node carries its full title on hover.
this paper works it cites works citing it node size = global citations · hover for the full title

What this paper cites, inside the corpus

Topics

AI-based Problem Solving and PlanningComputer Science
Constraint Satisfaction and OptimizationComputer Science
Logic, Reasoning, and KnowledgeComputer Science

Is this record sound?

complete

Nothing in this record contradicts itself and no field we check is missing.

  • supports2 author record(s) attached.
  • supports86 reference(s) recorded.
  • neutralThe DOI carries no year to check against.
  • supportsA title is present.

Provenance

Everything above was read from one stored OpenAlex payload, fetched 2026-09-04T03:58:53+00:00.

sha256 db1645b78a57e29a…