GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding
Alex Wang, Amanpreet Singh, Julian Michael, Felix Hill, Omer Levy, Samuel Bowman
Human ability to understand language is general, flexible, and robust. In contrast, most NLU models above the word level are designed for a specific task and struggle with out-of-domain data. If we aspire to develop models with understanding beyond the detection of superficial correspondences between inputs and outputs, then it is critical to develop a unified model that can execute a range of linguistic tasks across different domains. To facilitate research in this direction, we present the General Language Understanding Evaluation (GLUE, gluebenchmark.com): a benchmark of nine diverse NLU tasks, an auxiliary dataset for probing models for understanding of specific linguistic phenomena, and an online platform for evaluating and comparing models. For some benchmark tasks, training data is plentiful, but for others it is limited or does not match the genre of the test set. GLUE thus favors models that can represent linguistic knowledge in a way that facilitates sample-efficient learning and effective knowledge-transfer across tasks. While none of the datasets in GLUE were created from scratch for the benchmark, four of them feature privately-held test data, which is used to ensure that the benchmark is used fairly. We evaluate baselines that use ELMo (Peters et al., 2018), a powerful transfer learning technique, as well as state-of-the-art sentence representation models. The best models still achieve fairly low absolute scores. Analysis with our diagnostic dataset yields similarly weak performance over all phenomena tested, with some exceptions.
What this paper cites, inside the corpus
What cites it, inside the corpus
Links
Topics
| Topic Modeling | Computer Science |
| Natural Language Processing Techniques | Computer Science |
| Multimodal Machine Learning Applications | Computer Science |
Is this record sound?
complete
Nothing in this record contradicts itself and no field we check is missing.
- supports6 author record(s) attached.
- supports19 reference(s) recorded.
- neutralThe DOI carries no year to check against.
- supportsA title is present.
Provenance
sha256 bba2969b3567609a…