Who Cited It

Interpreting Black-Box Models: A Review on Explainable Artificial Intelligence

2023 · Cognitive Computation · 1,981 citations · 0 from inside this corpus

Vikas Hassija, Vinay Chamola, Abhinandan Singal low, Divyansh Goel low, Kaizhu Huang, Simone Scardapane, Indro Spinelli, Mufti Mahmud, Amir Hussain

Abstract Recent years have seen a tremendous growth in Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based methodological development in a broad range of domains. In this rapidly evolving field, large number of methods are being reported using machine learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) models. Majority of these models are inherently complex and lacks explanations of the decision making process causing these models to be termed as 'Black-Box'. One of the major bottlenecks to adopt such models in mission-critical application domains, such as banking, e-commerce, healthcare, and public services and safety, is the difficulty in interpreting them. Due to the rapid proleferation of these AI models, explaining their learning and decision making process are getting harder which require transparency and easy predictability. Aiming to collate the current state-of-the-art in interpreting the black-box models, this study provides a comprehensive analysis of the explainable AI (XAI) models. To reduce false negative and false positive outcomes of these back-box models, finding flaws in them is still difficult and inefficient. In this paper, the development of XAI is reviewed meticulously through careful selection and analysis of the current state-of-the-art of XAI research. It also provides a comprehensive and in-depth evaluation of the XAI frameworks and their efficacy to serve as a starting point of XAI for applied and theoretical researchers. Towards the end, it highlights emerging and critical issues pertaining to XAI research to showcase major, model-specific trends for better explanation, enhanced transparency, and improved prediction accuracy.

Interpreting Black-Box Models: A Review on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (2023)Interpreting Black-Box Models…Random Forests (2001)Random ForestsGreedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. (2001)Greedy function approximation…"Why Should I Trust You?" (2016)"Why Should I Trust You?"Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search (2016)Mastering the game of Go with…Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challe… (2019)Explainable Artificial Intell…Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (2018)Peeking Inside the Black-Box:…Statistical Modeling: The Two Cultures (with comments and a rejoinder by the author) (2001)Statistical Modeling: The Two…A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Toward Medical XAI (2020)A Survey on Explainable Artif…Explaining prediction models and individual predictions with feature contributions (2013)Explaining prediction models …Anchors: High-Precision Model-Agnostic Explanations (2018)Anchors: High-Precision Model…KNN Model-Based Approach in Classification (2003)KNN Model-Based Approach in C…Peeking Inside the Black Box: Visualizing Statistical Learning With Plots of Individual C… (2014)Peeking Inside the Black Box:…Adversarial Examples: Attacks and Defenses for Deep Learning (2019)Adversarial Examples: Attacks…Visualizing the Effects of Predictor Variables in Black Box Supervised Learning Models (2020)Visualizing the Effects of Pr…
14 of 14 neighbouring works in this corpus. Blue is what this paper cites; orange is what cites it, and a dashed line is one neighbour citing another. Only the largest labels are drawn — every node carries its full title on hover.
this paper works it cites works citing it node size = global citations · hover for the full title

What this paper cites, inside the corpus

Topics

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Computer Science
Imbalanced Data Classification TechniquesComputer Science
Machine Learning in HealthcareComputer Science

Is this record sound?

complete

Nothing in this record contradicts itself and no field we check is missing.

  • supports9 author record(s) attached.
  • supports135 reference(s) recorded.
  • neutralThe DOI carries no year to check against.
  • supportsA title is present.

Provenance

Everything above was read from one stored OpenAlex payload, fetched 2026-09-04T03:58:51+00:00.

sha256 6e314d9c6052d1ed…